CTMS owns operational coordination at Study, Study Country and Study Site scope. It tracks plans,
milestones, metrics, operational issues and monitoring. Subject/visit records received from EDC or
RTSM are operational projections, not a second source of clinical truth.
│ ├── StudyPerson / StudyOrganization
│ ├── SubjectOperationalSummary
│ │ └── SubjectVisitOperationalSummary
│ ├── MonitoringVisitParticipant
│ ├── MonitoredSubject snapshot
│ ├── MonitoredSubjectVisit snapshot
├── StudyMilestone / CountryMilestone
├── EnrollmentPlan and Metrics
Aggregate
Commands
Rules
StudyParticipation
include country, add site, change operational state, assign organization/person
country and site must remain in the Study hierarchy
Milestone
plan, forecast, achieve, revise forecast, invalidate actual
scope is exactly Study, Country or Site; planned/forecast/actual dates are distinct
EnrollmentPlan
set target, forecast, record actual projection
actual subject milestones arrive from authoritative conduct systems
OperationalIssue
record, classify, assign, mitigate, close, reopen
observation, protocol deviation and follow-up item remain distinct types
MonitoringSchedule
approve template application, schedule recurring event, adjust window
approved schedule creates events; country override outranks Study template
MonitoringEvent
plan, confirm, conduct, capture snapshot, issue report, follow up, complete
activity and subject snapshots preserve what the monitor knew at visit time
Observed product behaviour
TechSol decision
Difference / question
Shared hierarchy of Study, Study Country and Study Site
canonical operational spine with one stable identity per participation
may a facility have two concurrent Study Sites for distinct departments?
Subject records are typically integration-populated
CTMS owns SubjectOperationalSummary, not Participant or Casebook
which manual corrections are permitted without changing the source?
Monitoring Event contains snapshots of subjects, visits, ICFs, issues and metrics
MonitoringEvidenceSnapshot is immutable visit-time evidence, not a live reference
how are post-visit corrections appended to the report evidence?
Milestones track study/country/site dates and monitoring events
milestone has discriminated scope and optional source occurrence reference
which actual dates are manually decided versus event-derived?
Metrics update after subject/status changes
metrics are dated projections with source and calculation version
what is the canonical as-of and late-arriving-data policy?